main differences between mass murder and city nuclear bomb
i was reading a book by the famous author Clancy,. in one story the "president" went to visit a nazi death center and "thought" about the horror of mass murder killing women... strike one, and then comparing his authority as president to use an atomic bomb... strike two and then deciding "never again" on both... strike three! you are out.
dont you know the differences??
??
the story of nazi was gathering a "certain ethnicity" and killing=murder, many=mass murder of that ethnicity separated for destruction... even the "unarmed" men... yes even men is murder if unarmed! ergo many by train load and filling gas chambers is mass murder. clancy and his character did not notice the jew-men were peaceful not any physical threat with weapons but instead unarmed. [well a threat to their male infants but still different from war].
in contrast battle is in war both sides have weapons but murder is when the victim is unarmed as above. far worse, that murder was an ethnic murder separating and isolating a certain ethnicity in contrast to a city bmb that equally kills every enemy without separating any ethnicity... the big bomb is not separating but nazi targeted a certain ethnicity to mass murder that ethnicity with worse treatment while a bomb in war is equality not "worse treatment" to one ethnicity but every ethnicity in the city equal.
the point is not women! even men is murder when unarmed. an atom bmb is like a bomb and is horrible if used during peace! but in the case of japan or nuclear detterrent.... that is during war when bombs are needed due to the war.
if an american president would annnounce "i like this clancy idea... if pakistan or whoever burns our city with a hydrogen bomb... i will not "stoop" to the low level copy the cruelty to use such a mass murder weapon.... even dring war... then WHAT would STOP china or pakistan or russia from dropping theirs on american cities... while knowing no retaliation! what an idiot clancey was! his best seller was bought by americans who want america to lose so they can be under something far worse than any stain in american history.
team biden and harris dnc would use the bomb even in peace, that is the problem we must prevent and protest, at least obama did not nuke canada... and biden did not nuke anybody... yet..... but if they use it in war as above that would be proper.
i was reading a book by the famous author Clancy,. in one story the "president" went to visit a nazi death center and "thought" about the horror of mass murder killing women... strike one, and then comparing his authority as president to use an atomic bomb... strike two and then deciding "never again" on both... strike three! you are out.
dont you know the differences??
??
the story of nazi was gathering a "certain ethnicity" and killing=murder, many=mass murder of that ethnicity separated for destruction... even the "unarmed" men... yes even men is murder if unarmed! ergo many by train load and filling gas chambers is mass murder. clancy and his character did not notice the jew-men were peaceful not any physical threat with weapons but instead unarmed. [well a threat to their male infants but still different from war].
in contrast battle is in war both sides have weapons but murder is when the victim is unarmed as above. far worse, that murder was an ethnic murder separating and isolating a certain ethnicity in contrast to a city bmb that equally kills every enemy without separating any ethnicity... the big bomb is not separating but nazi targeted a certain ethnicity to mass murder that ethnicity with worse treatment while a bomb in war is equality not "worse treatment" to one ethnicity but every ethnicity in the city equal.
the point is not women! even men is murder when unarmed. an atom bmb is like a bomb and is horrible if used during peace! but in the case of japan or nuclear detterrent.... that is during war when bombs are needed due to the war.
if an american president would annnounce "i like this clancy idea... if pakistan or whoever burns our city with a hydrogen bomb... i will not "stoop" to the low level copy the cruelty to use such a mass murder weapon.... even dring war... then WHAT would STOP china or pakistan or russia from dropping theirs on american cities... while knowing no retaliation! what an idiot clancey was! his best seller was bought by americans who want america to lose so they can be under something far worse than any stain in american history.
team biden and harris dnc would use the bomb even in peace, that is the problem we must prevent and protest, at least obama did not nuke canada... and biden did not nuke anybody... yet..... but if they use it in war as above that would be proper.
No comments:
Post a Comment