only one covenant fulfilled the prophecy and the plan.

 only one covenant fulfilled the prophecy and the plan.

some may ask: if moses was a prophet how can anyone change the covenant brought from god?
indeed this is the error of literalist jews, writing in books baselessly and sometimes conflicting prophecy that the laws are forever.

for example moses said do not eat pork. is that forever? perhaps islam matched the true prophecy by also forbidden pig? nope.
even if assume moses brought a true message prophecy , still moses also described d
something different in the original plan.
"in your mouth and in your hearts to do" in book deuteronomy.
the grammar is to do, not "add thought to action" as some twist but that is not in the text.
in fact this can even be interpreted during moses time that reading fulfilled action because "the doing was in mouth" by reading. whether ceremony or law. any word "do" in the same book was defined here as do "by speaking". take a palm branch, seems action until defined, not outside but WITHIN that the doing is by reading say in your mouth. equally eat unleavened bread by mouth is not swallow but same mouth as the palm.
but even if do was action, temporarily,   still this not deleted the message do by mouth that is doing even without action.
similarly jeremiah 31 brought a message of a new covenant but he described it too. in heart. if we interpret moses read, this new different it is not even lip motion nor eye motion but thinking sufficed.
or it matched that idea from moses in heart. either way matched.
the source of prophecy planned a shift, a time for doing as sbove, read or act and also a new different covenant not like previous but in heart is sufficient not more than thought for fulfilling covenant. admittedly must add some action but that is not the covenant, just toward people as paul described.
which prophet matched?
not hindu kuz before jeremia, wjo said this will come, after hom.
the advantage of first excluded it from fulfilling the plan , announced by jeremiah in his future.
i claim hindu older is the weakness of primitives therefore polytheism which was replaced by mind maturing and progress.
maybe islam if muhamed was a prophet? but his message is a "covenant of actions"  thinking alone is not enough for covenant if eat during month of ramadan or show hair without veil, or more than one eye, is not submitting.
if ramadan month is same as usual day as if not commanded, that is not submission.
so that is not the new covenant.
the only one that matched is romans  chapter 7 and similar messages that is the plan of progress and was fulfilled.  see pictures.

did jeremia ever say that that was temporary? never so it cant be replaced by later prophets including muhamed and baha-ula etc. their laws do not match the covenant and no prophecy by jeremiah for additional changes.
in short the o.t. pointed to the grace in n.t. so any detail in n.t. that seems to be law is the law of jesus as specified in romans.

sources

romans 7,6 8,2 1cor9,20+21 2cor3,11 faded temporary

gal 3.23+24 gal.5,18+6,2. eph. 2,15