song fixing spirit

 one worship song "invites come" holy spirit, but despite nice melody the words are problematic.

we can analyze "come spirit of god and fill my soul. lead us like children. only you we want. we invite you come. welcome"

this doesn't match the christian faith see 1 cor. 3, 16 ye are the temple of God, the Spirit of God dwells in you" only if you deny bible that it dwells in you, can you invite it. 

similarly in the jewish part, isaia 63, "the angel etc. rebelled the holy spirit etc. placed IN him holy spirit" see verses 9 until end 11. 

FIRST we swap "glory" instead of spirit to fix this problem, which matches usage in exodus 40,  before analyzing further.

"Come the glory (spirit) of god and fill this place (my soul.) Spirit of God, guide (lead) my soul (us like children. only)

glory of God you we want. we invite you knowing  you will come. 

welcome here, welcome here,  oh glory of god.

welcome here, welcome here,  oh glory of god."

in source, we see from context a certain "angel" was called holy spirit that term refers to an angel and similarly the spirit of god in the creation story was that angel not as rabbis taught day 2, but before light already an angel existed.

 the church teachers dared to write "holy spirit is less than jesus who is less than god" source one of the bible book listers. they are not the same one but jesus was less than god not divine nor other god  but lord greater than angels and holy ghost or holy spirit which is an angel INSIDE  as we see in above sources so not only is invite wrong it can only be sincere if deny holy prophet and apostle paul.

only the idea "lead" matched john 16, 13 "he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth" the teacher guide, but invitation is err and wrong and not possible. and not like children, like students.

invite and welcome are wrong already inside. we can switch lead for biblical "guide" as promised "teach everything". also why "fill" just dwell as source above and as elaborated later.

also the phrase "only" excluded god "only you" that excluded jesus and god and not same one as above even trinity said different person so saying only is wrong even if 3 persons are one god which is not the religion of prophets the prophet brought message that spirit is angel and in as above sources. 

similarly in genesis story spirit of god is angel sent by god as in 63,9 called his spirit. not a third appearance of one god or similar trinity ideas but less than jesus not the same one god but both less than god and therefore not gods.

we should delete almost every word of that song if we trust the bible.

come spirit of god and fill my (soul.) lead us like children. only you we want. we invite you come welcome"

the soul despite being a spirit and from god is not the "his holy spirit" that is the name of angel as in isaia 63,9. 

in addition to the part called soul mentioned in mat. 10, 28 which hell can destroy matching john 3 not pain forever, that part everyone has but another thing not everyone has holy spirit UNTIL accepted the gift of grace if accepted then "all baptised by spirit" all of us even before water which rejecting water is better, i did not come to baptise and acts 1, and other sources if baptism spirit and one in eph. then no other beside spirit which is in anyone who believes the gift. 

so we reorder the remnant "spirit of god, we want you to lead our souls." instead of their  song "(come) spirit of god (and fill) my soul. lead us (like children. only) you we want. we (invite you come welcome)" only if deny having can sincerely ask and want "it" but if have then not invite so we see that author rejected lessons in bible: dwells and in and "all baptised by spirit".

reorder finds 2 new flaws first the change from singular my soul to plural we. also if i already have a thing for example "a napkin" and i say "i want a napkin" that is wrong unless another but that is silly we can only "want" if think not have which rejected the lesson in bible so we must fix the order not "we want you." but as above want to be students. 

we can defend the inconsistency which is forbidden in grammar by separate sentences where each one started separate but joined group yet still... as a song planned for singers they already gathered.

 we could request fill as used in exodus 35, but still not fill soul just "filled him" so fill me but not soul because that would exclude body and OPPOSITE from song.... in fact the BODY is the temple as above... gasp. almost every word rejected the bible. 

and... what is the difference whether fills or dwells "in" even in part just in heart or wherever  as long as have. is fill more? of something infinite, if it is spirit it is infinite even without filling whether soul excluding body or body which is temple. the author denied many lesons so how could it this song be accepted by teachers? we must replace. and analyze as above... unless it and the teachers insincere as "row your boat". 

 an alternative is to swap out spirit for "glory" the usage "fill" is in exodus 40, THAT we could invite, "Come the glory (spirit) of god and fill this place (my soul.) Spirit of God lead my soul (us like children. only)  glory of God you we want. we invite you knowing you will come.  

welcome here, welcome here,  oh glory of god, x2"